MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034427767 · doi:10.5006/1.3277315

Effect of Ferrous Ion Oxidation on Corrosion of Active Iron under an Aerated Solution Layer

2002· article· en· W2034427767 on OpenAlexafffund
F.M. Song, Donald W. Kirk, J. W. Graydon, D. E. Cormack

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsFerrousCorrosionAerationLayer (electronics)IonMetallurgyMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new model was developed to study the effect of ferrous ion oxidation on the corrosion of active iron. When ferrous hydroxide precipitate is present at the iron surface as the result of corrosion, the solution boundary layer near the iron surface is saturated with ferrous hydroxide and the pH and ferrous ion concentration are fixed within the layer. The ferrous hydroxide precipitate and that of ferric hydroxide are often porous and do not provide resistance to the transport of solution species. Since this work deals with active iron corrosion, a passive film at the iron surface is not considered. The results show that ferrous ion oxidation decreases corrosion because it decreases oxygen concentration in the boundary layer. The corrosion rate can be decreased by up to 13.9%. This value is independent of boundary layer thickness, temperature, and saturation factor of ferrous hydroxide. The results indicate that ferrous ion oxidation does have an effect on the rate of iron corrosion and that neglecting ferrous ion oxidation when determining iron corrosion results in an overestimate of the corrosion rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCORROSIONSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207