MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034433345 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.563304

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Enhanced Thrombolysis

2010· review· en· W2034433345 on OpenAlex
Georgios Tsivgoulis, Jürgen Eggers, Marc Ribó, Fabienne Perren, Maher Saqqur, Marta Rubiera, Theodoros Ν. Sergentanis, Κonstantinos Vadikolias, Vincent Larrue, Carlos A. Molina, Andrei V. Alexandrov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisStroke (engine)UltrasoundRadiologyCardiologyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis is a promising new approach to facilitate reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. So far, 3 different ultrasound technologies were used to increase the thrombolytic activity of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), including transcranial Doppler (TCD), transcranial color-coded duplex (TCCD), and low-frequency ultrasound. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis compared to the current standard of care (intravenous tPA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Through Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database search, we identified and abstracted all studies of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in acute cerebral ischemia. Principal investigators were contacted if data not available through peer-reviewed publication were needed. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and recanalization rates were compared between tPA, tPA+TCD+/-microspheres (microS), tPA+TCCD+/-microS, and tPA+low-frequency ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 6 randomized (n=224) and 3 nonrandomized (n=192) studies were identified. The rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in randomized studies were as follows: tPA+TCD, 3.8% (95% CI, 0%-11.2%); tPA+TCCD, 11.1% (95% CI, 0%-28.9%); tPA+low-frequency ultrasound, 35.7% (95% CI, 16.2%- 61.4%); and tPA alone, 2.9% (95% CI, 0%-8.4%). Complete recanalization rates were higher in patients receiving combination of TCD with tPA 37.2% (95% CI, 26.5%- 47.9%) compared with patients treated with tPA alone 17.2% (95% CI, 9.5%-24.9%). In 8 trials of high-frequency (TCD/TCCD) ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis, tPA+TCD/TCCD+/-microS was associated with a higher likelihood of complete recanalization (pooled OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.70-5.25; P=0.0001) when compared to tPA alone. High-frequency ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis was not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (pooled OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.44-3.60; P=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The present safety and signal-of-efficacy data of high-frequency ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis should be taken into account in the design of future randomized controlled trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it