MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034439975 · doi:10.1007/s11746-002-0555-x

Multivariate model for the prediction of total phenolic acids in crude extracts of polyphenols from canola and rapessed meals: A preliminary study

2002· article· en· W2034439975 on OpenAlexaff
M. Naczk, J. Pink, R. Zadernowski, David A. Pink

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanolaRapeseedPolyphenolPartial least squares regressionMultivariate statisticsChemistryFood scienceBrassicaAcetoneChromatographyMathematicsBotanyStatisticsOrganic chemistryBiologyAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The feasibility of using UV spectrophotometry to develop multivariate models for prediction of total phenolic acids content in crude polyphenol extracts from defatted canola and rapeseed meals was investigated. The polyphenols were extracted from the meals with methanol/acetone/water (7∶7∶6, by vol). Partial least squares regression was used to correlate the spectral data of the crude polyphenols in methanol between 320 and 355 nm with the total phenolic acid content in canola and rapeseed meals. The Folin‐Denis assay was used to provide reference data for creating the model. The predictive ability of the model is good, as indicated by the RPD value (the ratio of the SD of data to the standard error of calibration) of 3.84.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207