MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2034455695 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-575

Abstract 575: Cdk1 prevents DNA rereplication in G2/M by phosphorylating and facilitating the removal of Cdc7 from chromatin at the end of S phase.

2013· article· en· W2034455695 on OpenAlexaff
James Knockleby, Byung Ju Kim, Hoyun Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA replication factor CDT1DNA re-replicationCyclin-dependent kinase 1BiologyCell biologyOrigin recognition complexPre-replication complexLicensing factorEukaryotic DNA replicationCyclin-dependent kinaseControl of chromosome duplicationPhosphorylationDNA replicationChromatinCancer researchCell cycleGeneticsCancerDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cancer is inextricably linked with aneuploidy. Aneuploidy can arise for a number of reasons, including the deregulation of DNA and centrosome replication. Mechanisms have evolved that are designed to ensure that DNA is replicated only once per cell cycle. The initiation of DNA replication is a key target of these mechanisms, which includes regulating Cdc6, Cdt1 and Cyclin dependent kinases (Cdks). Although the regulatory mechanisms of Cdc6 and Cdt1 are known, the role of Cdk1 in particular is less clear. One potential target for Cdk1 regulation is the Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase (DDK), which acts as a licensing factor for DNA replication. DDK performs an essential and critical step in initiating DNA replication. As such, it is a target for novel cancer therapeutic drugs currently in clinical trials. Even so, the regulatory mechanisms dictating DDK function in human cells remains poorly understood. A site-directed mutagenesis approach was undertaken to determine the in vivo function of Cdk-dependent phosphorylation sites on the primary Cdc7 sequence. Using over-expressed Cdc7 in human cells (HEK293T), the functional significance of Cdc7 phosphorylation was determined; both the lack of phosphorylation and constitutive phosphorylation of Cdc7 was analyzed. We found that Cdc7, the catalytic subunit of the DDK, is a target of Cdk1. Cdc7 is phosphorylated in G2/M phase by Cdk1. Phosphorylation of Cdc7 removes the catalytic subunit of DDK from origins of replication and chromatin with the assistance of the nuclear export factor CRM1, which relocates Cdc7 to the microtubule cytoskeleton. Finally, the Cdk1-dependent removal of Cdc7 from chromatin prevents the cell from initiating DNA replication, indicating that Cdc7 is a target of Cdk1-dependent inhibition of DNA re-replication. We conclude that (1) Cdk1 phosphorylates Cdc7 in vivo. (2) Cdk1 dependent phosphorylation of Cdc7 regulates chromatin binding and DNA replication and (3) pCdc7 is associated with the nuclear export factor CRM1 in G2/M phase, suggesting a mechanism that couples the down-regulation of Cdc7 function at the end of S phase through nuclear localization and chromatin association. Taken together, our data provides key insight into the functional understanding of DDK. Citation Format: James Knockleby, Byung Ju Kim, Hoyun Lee. Cdk1 prevents DNA rereplication in G2/M by phosphorylating and facilitating the removal of Cdc7 from chromatin at the end of S phase. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 575. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-575

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→