MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimental Evidence for Ising Spin-Glass Transition in the YbCoGaO<sub>4</sub>Single Crystal

2011· article· en· W2034476950 on OpenAlexaff
R. Szymczak, H. A. Dabkowska, A. Dąbkowski, G. M. Luke, P. Aleshkevych, J. Fink‐Finowicki, H. Szymczak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsIsing modelSpin glassMagnetizationCusp (singularity)Magnetic susceptibilityParamagnetismAnisotropyScalingIsing spinSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsCritical exponentMaterials sciencePhase transitionMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanicsThermodynamicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic measurements (ac and dc susceptibilities and magnetization) on YbCoGaO 4 single crystal as a function of frequency and temperature are presented. The studied system behaves like a three-dimensional Ising-like spin glass. A cusp is seen only in the longitudinal susceptibility, whereas a paramagnetic behavior is observed in the transverse susceptibility. Typical spin glass features are observed in the frequency and temperature dependence of the ac susceptibility. Dynamical scaling is performed and critical exponents are deduced and compared to those obtained for Ising and Heisenberg systems. The origin of the Ising anisotropy of Yb 3+ and Co 2+ ions is briefly discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207