MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034491440 · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e3181676fe7

Chondroid Cystic Malformation of the Lung With Trisomy 8 Mosaicism: A New Cystic Lung Malformation

2008· article· en· W2034491440 on OpenAlexaff
Dorothée Bouron‐Dal Soglio, Anne‐Laure Rougemont, Anthony de Buys Roessingh, Raouf Fetni, Françoise Rypens, Sarah Bouchard, Alexandre Montpetit, Jean‐Christophe Fournet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyLungBiologyAnatomyTrisomyPulmonary sequestrationCystMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal cystic disorders of the lungs are a heterogeneous malformative group including giant lobar hyperinflation, congenital pulmonary airway malformations, intralobar pulmonary sequestration, and bronchogenic cyst. Here, we describe a giant cystic pulmonary malformation in a 5-year-old girl, morphologically characterized by a highly disorganized proliferation of numerous cartilage islands, abundant mesenchymal tissue with abundant adipose differentiation, and epithelium-lined cysts. Cytogenetic analysis revealed an isolated trisomy 8, as the sole karyotype anomaly, a finding further confirmed by a whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism array genotyping. The trisomy 8 was observed by fluorescent in situ hybridization within the malformation, and also in adjacent pulmonary parenchyma. A search of the literature revealed only 2 cases having similarities with the present case, but bearing different names. We believe that this lesion differs from congenital pulmonary airway malformations and from adult-type pulmonary hamartomas. We propose for this malformative mass the name "chondroid cystic malformation of the lung."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207