MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034537853 · doi:10.3766/jaaa.16.3.3

Estimating Audiometric Thresholds Using Auditory Steady-State Responses

2005· article· en· W2034537853 on OpenAlexaff
Terence W. Picton, Andrew Dimitrijevic, Maria-Cecilia Perez-Abalo, Patricia Van Roon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologyStimulus (psychology)SensationMedicineHearing impairedElectrophysiologyAudiometrySensorineural hearing lossHearing lossPsychologyInternal medicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) were recorded using stimulus rates of 78–95 Hz in normal young subjects, in elderly subjects with relatively normal hearing, and in elderly subjects with sensorineural hearing impairment. Amplitude-intensity functions calculated relative to actual sensory thresholds (sensation level or SL) showed that amplitudes increased as stimulus intensity increased. In the hearing-impaired subjects this increase was more rapid at intensities just above threshold ("electrophysiological recruitment") than at higher intensities where the increase was similar to that seen in normal subjects. The thresholds in dB SL for recognizing an ASSR and the intersubject variability of these thresholds decreased with increasing recording time and were lower in the hearing impaired compared to the normal subjects. After 9.8 minutes of recording, the average ASSR thresholds (and standard deviations) were 12.6 ± 8.7 in the normal subjects, 12.4 ± 11.9 dB in the normal elderly, and 3.6 ± 13.5 dB SL in the hearing-impaired subjects. Se registraron respuestas auditivas de estado estable (ASSR) en humanos, usando una tasa de estímulos de 78-95 Hz en sujetos jóvenes con audicón normal, en sujetos ancianos con una audición relativamente normal, y en sujetos ancianos con un trastorno auditivo sensorineural. Las funciones de amplitud-intensidad calculadas en relación con los umbrales auditivos reales (nivel de sensación o SL) mostraron que las amplitudes aumentan conforme se incrementa la intensidad. En los sujetos hipoacúsicos este incremento fue más rápido en intensidades justo por encima del umbral ("reclutamiento electrofisiológico") que a intensidades mayores, donde el incremento era similar al visto en los sujetos normales. Los umbrales en dB SL para reconocer una ASSR, y la variabilidad inter-sujetos de estos umbrales, disminuyó conforme aumentó el tiempo de registro y fue menor en los sujetos hipoacúsicos, comparada con los normales. Luego de 9.8 minutos de registro, los umbrales promedio de las ASSR (y sus desviaciones estándar) fue de 12.6 ± 8.7 en los sujetos normales, 12.4 ± 11.9 dB en los ancianos normales y 3.6 ± 13.5 dB SL en los sujetos hipoacúsicos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations180
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of AudiologySame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207