Threshold ion-pair production spectroscopy (TIPPS) of H2 and D2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The threshold ion-pair production spectra at the J" = 0 and J" = 1 thresholds of H2 and J" = 0, 1 and 2 thresholds of D2 obtained with single photon excitation are presented. The ion-pair yield spectra of H2 and D2 over these energy ranges demonstrate strong resonant enhancement, parts of which dominate the TIPPS signals, permitting the assignment of the lower states of these resonances. From those thresholds with weak resonant enhancement (the J" = 0 threshold of H2 and the J" = 1 threshold of D2) a very small direct contribution to ion-pair production can be observed. The behaviour of the TIPPS spectra taken with different applied discrimination fields is understood by modeling the field ionization behaviour of a MATI spectrum of H2, containing both the similarly resonantly enhanced v+ = 8 S(0) ionization threshold and the non-resonantly enhanced S(1) ionization threshold. From the H2 J" = 1 and D2 J" = 0 TIPPS spectra the energetic field-free thresholds of the H2 and D2 ion-pair limits were determined to be 139,714.8 +/- 1.0 cm-1 and 140,370.2 cm-1 +/- 1.0 cm-1, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".