MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034555883 · doi:10.2514/2.5800

Pressure Drop Across a Double-Outlet Vortex Chamber

2001· article· en· W2034555883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Propulsion and Power · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRanque-Hilsch vortex tube
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPressure dropDimensionless quantityVortexMechanicsDrop (telecommunication)Chamber pressureMaterials scienceControl volumeThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The properties of the pressure drop in a medium-aspect-ratio vortex chamber with double outlets are examined both experimentally and theoretically. Dimensional analysis provides the functional relationships between the main dimensionless groups. Application of the integral equations of continuity and energy over the control volume, along with the minimum-pressure-drop principle, furnish the required formulas that relate the predominant nondimensionalparameters. In the vortex-dominatedregime, the theoretical results, given in terms of the pressure drop across the chamber, are found to agree with the experimental observations. The larger outlet has been shown to control the  ow. A considerable reduction in static pressure drop across the chamber can be gained by adding an extra outlet at the opposite end-plate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it