MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034556794 · doi:10.1063/1.1984078

Fabrication and optical characterization of hexagonal photonic crystal microcavities in InP-based membranes containing InAs∕InP quantum dots

2005· article· en· W2034556794 on OpenAlexafffund
Dan Dalacu, Simon Frédérick, A. L. Bogdanov, Philip J. Poole, G. C. Aers, Robin L. Williams, Murray W. McCutcheon, Jeff F. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceQuantum dotMaterials sciencePhotonic crystalOptoelectronicsFabricationHexagonal latticeDipoleCondensed matter physicsCrystal (programming language)Q factorWavelengthResonatorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hexagonal photonic crystal microcavities with missing-hole defects were fabricated in suspended InP membranes. Embedded InAs quantum dots were utilized as broadband emitters to characterize the modes of the cavities. Photoluminescence emission consists of two orthogonally polarized peaks corresponding to the two dipole modes of the hexagonal defect cavity of reduced symmetry. The emission wavelength ranges from 745 to 840 meV, depending on the crystal structure, and quality factors are up to 850. Finite-difference time-domain simulations reproduce the cavity mode energies and the quality factor dependence on the crystal structure, but predict quality factors systematically lower. The experimental quality factors and mode splittings are associated with a slight ellipticity of the lattice holes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207