MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034607156 · doi:10.1139/e09-006

New insights on faults in the Peace River Arch region, northwest Alberta, based on existing well-log data and refined trend surface analysis

2009· article· en· W2034607156 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Shilong Mei

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsGeologyGrabenPaleozoicPermianMesozoicCretaceousPaleontologyFeature (linguistics)TectonicsStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the results of structural mapping in the Peace River Arch region, obtained by applying a refined trend surface analysis to existing well-log data. Maps generated with the new approach allow for accurate location of formation-top offsets and recognition of faults associated with small, metre-scale offsets. Consequently, new faults were identified in the Mesozoic strata, and faults previously recognized as only offsetting Paleozoic strata were found to extend into the Cretaceous strata but with much smaller formation-top offsets. This provided direct evidence for re-activation of the Dawson Creek Graben Complex (DCGC) during the Cretaceous. An additional structural feature named Clear River Graben was recognized to have affected Permian to Jurassic strata. Relationships among previously interpreted faults were clarified and the structural controls on the DCGC were more accurately evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2009
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207