Sourness-suppressing Peptides in Cooked Pork Loins
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to identify the sourness-suppressing peptides in cooked pork and to clarify the mechanism of sour taste suppression by the peptides. An extract prepared from pork loins vacuum-cooked at 60 degrees C for 6 hours after conditioning at 4 degrees C for 20 days was separated into three fractions: under MW 500 (Fraction I), MW 500-1,000 (Fraction II), and over MW 1,000 (Fraction III). The Fraction I content was largest. As judged by sensory evaluation, the addition of Fraction II was capable of suppressing stronger sourness than the other fractions. Fraction II also enhanced umami and saltiness. Three peptides (APPPPAEVHEVV, APPPPAEVHEVVE, and APPPPAEVHEVHEEVH) in Fraction II increased greatly during conditioning. A common peptide, APPPPAEVHEV, in the amino acid sequences of the three peptides suppressed the sour taste. The mechanism of sourness suppression by the peptide was concluded to comprise inhibition of the binding of sour taste substances to the membranes of the tongue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it