La gestion des seigneuries de Gabriel Christie dans la vallée du Richelieu (1760-1845)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plusieurs études récentes attirent l'attention sur la diversité des formes que pouvait prendre la tenure seigneuriale tout en affirmant son caractère essentiellement féodal. Mais la seigneurie laïque, plus sensible aux considérations familiales, demeure presque inconnue. Cette étude confirme la flexibilité de la tenure seigneuriale en démontrant son adaptation à l'exploitation forestière. Elle démontre en plus l'importance de la situation personnelle du seigneur et des pratiques de gestion dans les relations seigneur-censitaires, dont les points tournants suivent la conjoncture socio-économique : la migration loyaliste, la fin des guerres napoléoniennes, la défaite des Rébellions. On observe aussi l'importance des liens familiaux dans l'exercice du patronage seigneurial. Il se peut que l'étude des seules seigneuries ecclésiastiques ait dissimulé un facteur important du dynamisme social de la seigneurie — la famille seigneuriale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".