MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034711912 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2006.11.080

Determination of the Plk4/Sak consensus phosphorylation motif using peptide spots arrays

2006· article· en· W2034711912 on OpenAlexaff
Genie Leung, Cynthia S.W. Ho, Ivan M. Blasutig, James M. Murphy, Frank Sicheri

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotif (music)SpotsPeptidePhosphorylationConsensus sequenceChemistryComputational biologyBiologyPeptide sequenceBiochemistryBotanyArtGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The family of polo like kinases (Plks) regulate cell cycle progression through key functional roles in mitosis. While the four mammalian family members, Plk1-4, share overlapping functions, each member possesses unique functions that may be dictated in part by their ability to phosphorylate different substrates. Numerous cellular substrates for Plk1, 2, and 3 have been characterized, but the protein targets for Plk4/Sak remain unknown. We have purified the kinase domain of Sak and demonstrated that it has robust kinase activity in vitro. Using in vitro kinase assays on peptide spots arrays, we determined the consensus phosphorylation motif for Sak to be yen-[Ile/Leu/Val]-Ser/Thr-phi-phi-X- yen/Pro (where phi denotes a large hydrophobic residue, yen is a charged residue dependent on the context of the surrounding sequence, and residues in brackets are unfavoured). This consensus phosphorylation motif differs from that of Plk1, and provides a basis for future studies to identify in vivo substrates of Sak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207