Determination of the Plk4/Sak consensus phosphorylation motif using peptide spots arrays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The family of polo like kinases (Plks) regulate cell cycle progression through key functional roles in mitosis. While the four mammalian family members, Plk1-4, share overlapping functions, each member possesses unique functions that may be dictated in part by their ability to phosphorylate different substrates. Numerous cellular substrates for Plk1, 2, and 3 have been characterized, but the protein targets for Plk4/Sak remain unknown. We have purified the kinase domain of Sak and demonstrated that it has robust kinase activity in vitro. Using in vitro kinase assays on peptide spots arrays, we determined the consensus phosphorylation motif for Sak to be yen-[Ile/Leu/Val]-Ser/Thr-phi-phi-X- yen/Pro (where phi denotes a large hydrophobic residue, yen is a charged residue dependent on the context of the surrounding sequence, and residues in brackets are unfavoured). This consensus phosphorylation motif differs from that of Plk1, and provides a basis for future studies to identify in vivo substrates of Sak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".