Multiple depth cameras calibration and body volume reconstruction for gait analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last decade, gait analysis has become one of the most active research topics in biomedical research engineering partly due to recent development of sensors and signal processing devices and more recently depth cameras. The latters can provide real-time distance measurements of moving objects. In this context, we present a new way to reconstruct body volume in motion using multiple active cameras from the depth maps they provide. A first contribution of this paper is a new and simple external camera calibration method based on several plane intersections observed with a low-cost depth camera which is experimentally validated. A second contribution consists in a body volume reconstruction method based on visual hull that is adapted and enhanced with the use of depth information. Preliminary results based on simulations are presented and compared with classical visual hull reconstruction. These results show that as little as three low-cost depth cameras can recover a more accurate 3D body shape than twenty regular cameras.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it