MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034746284 · doi:10.1049/ip-cds:20050154

Clock jitter in direct RF and IF sampling wireless receivers

2006· article· en· W2034746284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Circuits Devices and Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)Carleton UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasebandJitterAutocorrelationUndersamplingBandwidth (computing)Spectral densityElectronic engineeringSampling (signal processing)Computer sciencePhysicsMathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of clock jitter on sampling systems is investigated. Analytical expressions are derived for the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an ideal analogue-to-digital converter (ADC). The SNR expressions are based on the autocorrelation function properties of stationary random signals. The power spectral density (PSD) of the analysed signals is baseband/bandpass rectangular and bandpass raised cosine. System level simulations show that the SNR depends on the signal frequency rather than the bandwidth for direct RF and IF sampling. Special focus is given to direct sampling systems with raised cosine PSD (IS-95) in the presence of a blocking signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it