Sea Ice Motion Tracking From Sequential Dual-Polarization RADARSAT-2 Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new sea ice motion tracking algorithm that operates with two sequential synthetic aperture radar (SAR) RADARSAT-2 ScanSAR images is presented. The feature tracking approach is based on the combination of the phase-correlation and cross-correlation methods. An algorithm for selecting control points, a matching technique, an approach for filtering out error vectors, and a confidence levels setting for output drift vectors were specifically developed in order to increase the system's robustness and accuracy. We evaluated ice motion tracking results derived from HH and HV channels of RADARSAT-2 ScanSAR imagery and formulated a condition where the HV channel is more reliable than the HH channel for ice tracking. Furthermore, we found that the ice motion tracking from the HV channel is not affected by noise floor stripes, which are prominent in the cross-polarization RADARSAT-2 ScanSAR images. The developed sea ice tracking technology was implemented at the Canadian Ice Service, Environment Canada for operational use. The system was successfully run to provide operational support of field work in the Arctic Ocean in compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the spring of 2010.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it