MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034777435 · doi:10.1353/can.2006.0034

Managing Changing Prairie Landscapes (review)

2006· article· en· W2034777435 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Liza Piper

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)SustainabilityGovernment (linguistics)DisciplineGeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningSociologySocial scienceEcologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Managing Changing Prairie Landscapes Liza Piper Managing Changing Prairie Landscapes. Edited by Todd A. Radenbaugh and Glenn C. Sutter. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center, 2005. $29.95 Managing Changing Prairie Landscapes is a collection of eleven articles that came out of a 2003 conference held in Regina on management policies affecting northern prairie ecosystems. This is a good collection of research drawn from authors working in the social, agricultural, and environmental sciences. Introductory and concluding commentaries assemble the individual chapters within a broader framework that assesses the ecological footprint of nineteenth- and twentieth-century economic activities on the northern prairies; raises concerns about the sustainability of these activities, particularly in the context of climate change; and considers the past and present character of natural, social, and manufactured capital across the region. The authors evaluate both government and community-based policy initiatives, such as the Frenchman River Biodiversity Project. Individual chapters speak directly to one another, and early context – including an outline of social capital – provides the foundation necessary for subsequent discussion. In these respects the collection is a successful example of what editors Radenbaugh and Sutter identify as trans-disciplinary (as opposed to interdisciplinary) research and writing. Chapters 4 through 6 variously consider the changing social landscape and economic well-being of prairie communities at the turn of the twenty-first century. These chapters build on recent works in the social sciences, including Roger Epp and Dave Whitson's Writing Off the Rural West (2001), that explore the encounters among rural communities, governments, and globalization. Readers of this journal will find that the authors and editors of this collection do not adequately historicize their research, even though chapters on energy trends, endemic bugs, sand hills, and desertification [End Page 164] directly address historical change. Contributors repeatedly evoke 'original' and 'undisturbed' prairie landscapes and present the advent of Euro-Canadian settlement on the prairies as the critical but unexplored conjuncture in the environmental history of the region. The main problem is that most of the authors seem unaware of the existing historiography. Classics of prairie agricultural historiography such as Gray's Men against the Desert (1967) or Fowke's The National Policy and the Wheat Economy (1957) are referenced, but more recent literature by Gerhard Ens (1996) or Clinton Evans (2002), for example, is noticeably absent. The research that adopts a historical perspective does so uncritically. In chapter 11, Sauchyn, Kennedy, and Stroich present a 'chronology of definitions [to reveal] the evolution of thinking and changing context' of desertification (137). Although this is an interesting overview, history is presented here as an uncontested record. One important exception is Andy Hamilton's chapter on endemic bugs, in which the author notes that the 'original extent and character' of the Canadian Great Plains is 'inadequately understood and subject to much more romanticism and overstatement' as compared to the American Great Plains (102). Hamilton's assessment of early sources, including eighteenth- and nineteenth-century maps for information on original vegetation, is an enlightened survey but would benefit from the insights offered by Alwynne Beaudoin regarding settlers' perceptions of prairie environments (Beaudoin 1999). Hamilton's observation that fewer sources exist to assess the historical character of the Great Plains in Canada is only partly correct. Detailed nineteenth-century census records and early-twentieth-century aerial photographs from south of the border, which form the documentary basis of the Great Plains Population and Environment Project (www.icpsr.umich.edu/PLAINS/), are exceptional sources and well-suited to digitization and technical analysis. This wealth of information should not obscure the censuses, surveyors journals, published accounts, and personal records that detail northern prairie environments prior to and alongside Euro-Canadian settlement. The chapter 'Energy Trends for Saskatchewan Farming, 1931–1991,' by Bob Stirling, offers the most effective historical analysis. Stirling concludes that as non-renewable energy sources replaced animal power and human labour, outputs increased while energy efficiency remained constant or declined (36). Stirling outlines a valuable methodology to compare early and late twentieth-century energy inputs and outputs, but one that demands greater qualification. Stirling notes, but does not account for, changing energy efficiencies in this period that affect the standardized coefficients used to represent...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207