Predictive Emission Monitoring Model for LM1600 Gas Turbines Based on Neural Network Architecture Trained on Field Measurements and CFD Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Predictive Emission Monitoring (PEM) model has been developed based on an optimized Neural Network (NN) architecture which takes 8 fundamental parameters as input variables. The model predicts both NO and NOx as output variables. The NN is initially trained using a combination of two sets of data: a) measured data at various loads from an LM1600 gas turbine installed at one of the compressor stations on TransCanada Transmission system in Alberta, Canada, b) data generated by a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) at different operating conditions covering the range of the engine operating parameters spanned over one year. The predictions of NOx by CFD employed the ‘flamelet’ model and a set of 8 reactions including the Zeldovich mechanism for thermal NOx along with an empirical correlation for prompt NOx formation. It was found that a Multi Layer Perceptron type Neural Network with two hidden layers was the optimum architecture for predicting NO levels with a maximum absolute error of around 7%, mean absolute error of 2.3% and standard deviation of 1.97%. The model is easy to implement on the station PLC. A set of one year data consisting of 2804 cases was submitted to the above optimized NN architecture with varying ambient temperature from –29.9 °C to 35.7 °C and output power from 570 kW to 16.955 MW. This gave consistent contours of NO levels. As expected, NN architecture shows that NO increases with increasing power or ambient temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it