Relation between cortical dopamine D<sub>2</sub> receptor occupancy and suppression of conditioned avoidance response in non‐human primate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Suppression of the conditioned avoidance response (CAR), a useful test for screening for antipsychotic effects, has been discussed in relation to the blockade of dopaminergic transmission. The purpose of the present paper was to investigate the relationship between cortical dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy and the suppression of CAR by haloperidol in non-human primate. The avoidance rate was measured for four different doses of haloperidol treatment in a rhesus monkey, and the cortical D(2) receptor occupancy was measured in a parallel session using positron emission tomography with [(11)C]FLB 457. The successful avoidance response rate was decreased for doses of 10 and 30 microg/kg of haloperidol, and this decrement was associated with 65-77% of D(2) receptor occupancy. It is suggested that the threshold level of cortical dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy for the suppression of CAR is demonstrated in the present study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".