MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034814128 · doi:10.1080/02533839.2000.9670547

Be analysis of dynamics of rigid foundations embedded in transversely isotropic soils

2000· article· en· W2034814128 on OpenAlexafffund
R. K. N. D. Rajapakse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransverse isotropyIsotropyBoundary element methodAnisotropySymmetry (geometry)GeometryBoundary value problemPhysicsMathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisStructural engineeringFinite element methodEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dynamic response of rigid massless cylindrical and hemispherical foundations embedded in transversely isotropic elastic soils is investigated in this study. The axis of symmetry of the foundation is assumed to be parallel to the material axis of symmetry of soil. The foundations are subjected to time‐harmonic forces acting in the vertical and horizontal directions and a time‐harmonic moment. The problems under consideration are solved by using the boundary element method. The kernels of the boundary integral equation correspond to elastodynamic Green's functions of a transversely isotropic elastic half space subjected to buried ring loads. Analytical solutions for Green's functions are used in the analysis. The solutions for impedances obtained from the present study are compared with those reported in literature for foundations embedded in isotropic soils. Selected numerical solutions are presented to portray the influence of material anisotropy, frequency of excitation and foundation geometry on impedances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Chinese Institute of EngineersSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207