MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034815413 · doi:10.1109/icsm.2010.5609533

SE-CodeSearch: A scalable Semantic Web-based source code search infrastructure

2010· article· en· W2034815413 on OpenAlexaff
Iman Keivanloo, Laleh Roostapour, Philipp Schügerl, Juergen Rilling

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceKPI-driven code analysisScalabilitySource codeInformation retrievalCode (set theory)Context (archaeology)The InternetInferenceSearch engineSemantic searchStatic program analysisWorld Wide WebSoftwareProgramming languageDatabaseSoftware developmentArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Available code search engines provide typically coarse-grained lexical search. To address this limitation we present SE-CodeSearch, a Semantic Web-based approach for Internet-scale source code search. It uses an ontological representation of source code facts and analysis knowledge to complete missing information using inference engine. This approach allows us to reason and search across project boundaries containing often incomplete code fragments extracted in a one-pass and no-order manner. The infrastructure provides a scalable approach to process and query across large code bases mined from software repositories and code fragments found online. We have implemented our SE-CodeSearch as part of SE-Advisor framework to demonstrate the scalability and applicability of our Internet-scale code search in a software maintenance context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207