Fabrication of ZnO Nanospikes and Nanopillars on ITO Glass by Templateless Seed-Layer-Free Electrodeposition and Their Field-Emission Properties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simple and direct electrodeposition technique is employed to fabricate ZnO nanospikes and nanopillars on indium-tin oxide glass substrates at 70 degrees C without using any template, catalyst, or seed layer. Both ZnO nanospikes and nanopillars exhibit highly crystalline ZnO wurtzite structure with a preferred (0001) plane orientation in their high-resolution transmission electron microscopic images and X-ray diffraction patterns. The corresponding Raman spectra provide evidence for the presence of defects and oxygen vacancies in these nanostructures, which could produce the photoluminescence observed in the visible region. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy further indicates the presence of a Zn(OH)2-rich surface region in these ZnO nanostructures and that a higher Zn(OH)2 surface moiety is found for nanospikes than nanopillars. In contrast to the nanopillars with flat tops, the nanospikes with tapered tips of 20-50 nm diameter provide a favorable geometry to facilitate excellent field-emission performance, with a low turn-on electric field of 3.2 V/microm for 1.0 microA/cm(2) and a threshold field of 6.6 V/microm for 1.0 mA/cm(2). The superior field-emission property makes the nanospikes among the best ZnO field emitters fabricated on a glass substrate at low temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it