MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034824620 · doi:10.1109/aina.2014.63

New Heuristic for Message Broadcasting in Networks

2014· article· en· W2034824620 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicComputer scienceConsistent heuristicInternet topologyBroadcasting (networking)HypercubePath (computing)Shortest path problemNull-move heuristicThe InternetCube (algebra)Theoretical computer scienceNetwork topologyDistributed computingAlgorithmComputer networkIncremental heuristic searchMathematicsParallel computingGraphCombinatoricsSearch algorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a new heuristic that generates broadcast schemes in arbitrary networks. The heuristic gives optimal broadcast time for HyperCube, and best results for Cube-Connected Cycles and large Shuffle-Exchange graphs. Extensive simulations show that our new heuristic outperforms the best known broadcast algorithms for two different network models representing Internet generated using BRITE (Boston university Representative Internet Topology gEnerator). It also has a low time complexity, O(\E\log\V\), which is lower compared to the complexities of most of the other good algorithms. The last advantage of the heuristic is that approximately one half of the nodes are informed via a shortest path from the originator, while the rest of the vertices receive the message via a path at most three hops longer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207