MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034871599 · doi:10.1353/crv.0.0021

Marji: Popular Commix Heroine Breathing Life into the Writing of History

2008· article· en· W2034871599 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Manuela Costantino

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirRepresentation (politics)Articulation (sociology)Meaning (existential)Perspective (graphical)PoliticsLiteraturePower (physics)Point (geometry)HistoryAestheticsArtVisual artsPhilosophyEpistemologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marjane Satrapi's graphic memoir Persepolis has become an extremely popular text in the last few years. Part of the power of Satrapi's memoir is that it recreates her childhood experience in Iran at the time of the Cultural Revolution, in the graphic genre. The combination of a visual representation and a child's point of view makes the story easily accessible and therefore attracts a wide range of readers. This easy access to the story, however, can lead to the assumption that the child's perspective is uncomplicated by the nuances of an adult point of view and the seemingly simple text is transparent, articulating only one meaning. This paper complicates such a simplistic reception of the text and explores the various cultural and political forces at work in the articulation of the contexts for the production and reception of Persepolis in both France and North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207