MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034881129 · doi:10.1081/sac-120017497

Predicting Multivariate Response in Linear Regression Model

2003· article· en· W2034881129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsMultivariate analysis of varianceStatisticsMathematicsMultivariate normal distributionEstimatorCovariance matrixScatter matrixBayesian multivariate linear regressionMatrix t-distributionWishart distributionLinear regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Predicting a multivariate response vector in a linear multivariate regression model requires the estimate of the matrix of regression parameters. Stein (Stein, C. (1973 Stein, C. 1973. Estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. Proc. Prague Symp. Asymp. Statist., : 345–381. [Google Scholar]). Estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. Proc. Prague Symp. Asymp. Statist. 345–381), van der Merwe and Zidek (van der Merwe, A., Zidek, J.V. (1980 van der Merwe, A. and Zidek, J. V. 1980. Multivariate regression analysis and canonical variates. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 8: 27–39. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). Multivariate regression analysis and canonical variates. Canadian Journal of Statistics 8:27–39), Bilodeau and Kariya (Bilodeau, M., Kariya, T. (1989 Bilodeau, M. and Kariya, T. 1989. Minimax estimators in the normal MANOVA model. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 28: 260–270. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Minimax estimators in the normal MANOVA model. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 28:260–270) and Konno (Konno, Y. (1990 Konno, Y. 1990. On estimation of a matrix of mean. Unpublished manuscript [Google Scholar]). On estimation of a matrix of mean. Unpublished manuscript; Konno, Y. (1991 Konno, Y. 1991. On estimation of a matrix of normal means with unknown covariance matrix. J. Multi. Analysis, 36: 44–55. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). On estimation of a matrix of normal means with unknown covariance matrix. J. Multi. Analysis 36:44–55) have shown that their shrinkage estimators perform better than the least squares estimator. Recently, Breiman and Friedman (Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H. (1997 Breiman, L. and Friedman, J. H. 1997. Predicting multivariate responses in multiple regression. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 59: 3–54. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). Predicting multivariate responses in multiple regression. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 59:3–54) proposed another class of shrinkage estimators, called C&W-GCV estimators. Through extensive simulations, they have showed that their C&W-GCV estimator performs better than the FICYREG estimator of van der Merwe and Zidek (van der Merwe, A., Zidek, J. V. (1980 van der Merwe, A. and Zidek, J. V. 1980. Multivariate regression analysis and canonical variates. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 8: 27–39. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). Multivariate regression analysis and canonical variates. Canadian Journal of Statistics 8:27–39), the reduced rank regression method of Anderson (Anderson, T. W. (1951 Anderson, T. W. 1951. Estimating linear restrictions on regression coefficients for multivariate normal distribution. Ann. Math. Statist., 22: 327–351. (Correction in Ann. Statist. (1980), 8, 1400)[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). Estimating linear restrictions on regression coefficients for multivariate normal distribution. Ann. Math. Statist., 22:327–351 (Correction in Ann. Statist. (1980), 8, 1400). Estimating linear restrictions on regression coefficients for multivariate normal distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 22:327–351. (Correction in Ann. Statist. (1980), 8, 1400)), the component-wise ridge regression and the partial least squares. They, however, did not include in their comparisons, the minimax estimators of Bilodeau and Kariya (Bilodeau, M., Kariya, T. (1989 Bilodeau, M. and Kariya, T. 1989. Minimax estimators in the normal MANOVA model. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 28: 260–270. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Minimax estimators in the normal MANOVA model. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 28:260–270) and Konno (Konno, Y. (1990 Konno, Y. 1990. On estimation of a matrix of mean. Unpublished manuscript [Google Scholar]). On estimation of a matrix of mean. Unpublished manuscript; Konno, Y. (1991 Konno, Y. 1991. On estimation of a matrix of normal means with unknown covariance matrix. J. Multi. Analysis, 36: 44–55. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). On estimation of a matrix of normal means with unknown covariance matrix. J. Multi. Analysis 36:44–55). In this article, we compare C&W-GCV estimator with two invariant minimax estimators and show that C&W-GCV does not perform as well as the two minimax estimators unless the number of response variables is fairly small compared to the number of independent variables and the sample size is small.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.355
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it