MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034897412 · doi:10.1139/p07-154

High-precision spectroscopy as a test of quantum electrodynamics in light atomic systems

2008· article· en· W2034897412 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
G. W. F. Drake

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsExcited stateRydberg formulaLamb shiftLogarithmGround stateHeliumSpectroscopyOrder (exchange)Hydrogen-like atomPrincipal quantum numberQuantum mechanicsIonizationRydberg constantMomentum (technical analysis)Quantum electrodynamicsAngular momentumQuantumTotal angular momentum quantum numberIonAngular momentum couplingElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a review of recent progress in high-precision calculations for the ground state and low-lying excited states of helium, including the nonrelativistic energy, relativistic corrections of α2 Ry, and quantum electrodynamic (QED) corrections of lowest order α3 Ry and next-to-leading-order α4 Ry, where α is the fine-structure constant. The calculations include the terms of order α4 Ry recently obtained by Pachucki (Phys. Rev. A, 74, 062510 (2006)). Estimates of the terms of order α5 Ry, including two-loop binding corrections, are included. Comparisons with experimental ionization energies indicate reasonably good agreement for the 1s2 1S0, 1s2s 1S0, 1s2s 3S1, and 1s2p 3Pcm states, but there is a significant discrepancy for the 1s2p 1P1 state of 5.6± 3.2 MHz. An asymptotic formula for the calculation of the Bethe logarithm for Rydberg states with large angular momentum L is presented in an Appendix. PACS Nos.: 31.30.Gs, 31.30.Jv

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207