Photoreflectance investigations of quantum well intermixing processes in compressively strained InGaAsP∕InGaAsP quantum well laser structures emitting at 1.55μm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have investigated the effects of interdiffusion and its technological parameters on the subband structure in compressively strained InGaAsP quantum wells (QWs) using photoreflectance and photoluminescence techniques. p-i-n laser structures with three QWs were grown by gas source molecular beam epitaxy and capped with dielectric films deposited by electron cyclotron resonance plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition and annealed using a rapid thermal annealing process. A numerical real-time wave-packet propagation method including static electric field, strain in the wells and barriers, and error function interface diffusion modeling is used to calculate the transition energies for the diffused QWs. It has been shown that the shift of the energy levels due to the interdiffusion related changes of the well confinement potential profile is a consequence of two competing processes: a change of the well width and an effective increase of the band gap energy resulting in a net blueshift of all optical transitions. Moreover, it has been found that quantum well intermixing does not significantly influence the built-in electric fields distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".