MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034900351 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2012.6345001

Evaluation of islanding detection techniques for inverter-based distributed generation

2012· article· en· W2034900351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingInverterComputer scienceDistributed generationMATLABWaveformSupport vector machineElectronic engineeringProbabilistic neural networkArtificial neural networkVoltageControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsTime delay neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper; four islanding detection techniques for inverter-based distributed generator (DG) are presented. The techniques are: decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), radial basis function network (RBF), and probabilistic neural network (PNN). In literature, these techniques were proposed as islanding detection methods. However, the proposed techniques face various limitations such as the size and type of the used distribution network and the limitation of the extracted features. This paper overcomes these limitations and gives a very accurate comparison between these techniques by extracting seven features from damped-sinusoid model of the voltage and frequency waveforms using the MATLAB/SIMULINK and also using the IEEE 34-bus distribution system. The results show that out of the four tested techniques, PNN technique can accurately detect islanding for inverter based DG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207