MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034904519 · doi:10.1109/fskd.2010.5569555

Fuzzy inference system for endocardial edge detection

2010· article· en· W2034904519 on OpenAlexaff
Hussin Ketout, Jason Gu, Gabrielle Horne

Bibliographic record

Venue2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmoothnessEdge detectionArtificial intelligenceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPattern recognition (psychology)Contrast (vision)InferenceFuzzy logicAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemFuzzy setComputer scienceDetectorSet (abstract data type)MathematicsFuzzy control systemComputer visionImage (mathematics)Image processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach for left ventricular endocardial edge detection based on fuzzy IF-THEN inference rules is proposed in this paper. The echocardiographic image is preprocessed to enhance the contrast and smoothness. Four inputs are given to fuzzy inference system from 3 × 3 spatial window; each input has five linguistic variables named VLOW, LOW, MED, HIGH and VHIGH. The fuzzy set and rules are derived heuristically to detect the edges even in low contrast region. The approach is successfully applied to echocardiographic images to detect the LV endocardial edges. The IF-THEN rules can be easily changed to adjust the edge thickness and it has a flexible structure to be adjusted. Some experimental results are given and compared to conventional edge detectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge DiscoverySame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207