MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034956953 · doi:10.1115/pvp2013-97296

Simplified Thermo-Elasto-Plastic Analysis Models for Determination of Global and Local Stresses in Coke Drums

2013· article· en· W2034956953 on OpenAlexafffund
Yanxiang Zhang, Zihui Xia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsCokeFinite element methodDrumSoftware packageCladding (metalworking)Materials scienceStructural engineeringShell (structure)Rotational symmetrySoftwareMechanical engineeringMechanicsEngineeringMetallurgyComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coke drums are major pressure vessels used in petroleum refineries. In this paper, two simplified analytical models based on thermo-elasto-plastic constitutive theory have been developed to evaluate global and local stresses in coke drums during their operation cycles. The first model considers the temperature and internal pressure cycle experienced by a drum shell element consisting of clad and base steels. The second model is an axisymmetric circular cladding plate model experiencing a non-uniform temperature distribution history. The latter model considers the effects of severe local non-uniform temperature distributions produced by the hot/cold spots appearing randomly in coke drums during the water quenching stage. The predicted results by the simplified models are in agreement with the results obtained from much complicated and time-consuming finite element analysis (FEA) models for the coke drums. Corresponding software packages for application of the two simplified analysis models (SAM) have also been developed. The developed SAM and software could be a more convenient analysis tool for coke drum designers and engineers in comparison to the use of FEA software package.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Structural Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207