MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035011106 · doi:10.1021/ja016905+

Density Functional Theory Study of Redox Pairs:  2. Influence of Solvation and Ion-Pair Formation on the Redox Behavior of Cyclooctatetraene and Nitrobenzene

2002· article· en· W2035011106 on OpenAlexaff
Mu‐Hyun Baik, Cynthia K. Schauer, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRedoxSolvationDensity functional theoryCyclooctatetraeneElectrolyteNitrobenzeneComputational chemistryIonChemical physicsPhysical chemistryMoleculeInorganic chemistryElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of the electrochemical behavior of cyclooctatetraene (COT) and nitrobenzene with Density Functional Theory and the conductor like solvation model (COSMO) is reported. The two-electron reduction of the tub-shaped COT molecule is accompanied by a structural change to a planar structure of D(4)(h)() symmetry in the first electron addition step, and to a fully aromatic structure of D(8)(h)() symmetry in the second electron addition step. Theoretical models are examined that are aimed at understanding the electrolyte- and solvent-dependent redox behavior of COT, in which a single 2e(-) redox wave is observed with KI electrolyte in liquid ammonia solution (DeltaDeltaE(disp) = [E(-2) - E(-1)] - [E(-1) - E(0)] < 0, inverted potential), while two 1e(-) redox waves are observed (DeltaDeltaE(disp) > 0) with NR(4)(+)X(-) (R = butyl, propyl; X(-) = perchlorate) electrolyte in dimethylformamide solution. In all cases, the computed reaction energy profiles are in fair agreement with the experimental reduction potentials. A chemically intuitive theoretical square scheme method of energy partitioning is introduced to analyze in detail the effects of structural changes and ion-pair formation on the relative energies of the redox species. The structural relaxation energy for conversion of tub-COT to planar-COT is mainly apportioned to the first reduction step, and is therefore a positive contribution to DeltaDeltaE(disp). The effect of the structural change on the disproportionation energy for COT is counteracted by the substantially more positive reduction potential for planar-(COT)(-1) in comparison to tub-(COT)(-1). Ion pairing of alkali metal counterions with the anionic reduction products gives rise to a negative contribution to DeltaDeltaE(disp) because the second ion-pairing step is more exothermic than the first, and the reduction of [KA] (A = COT, NB) is more exothermic than the reduction of A(-1). For COT, this negative energy differential term as a result of ion pairing predicts the experimentally observed inversion in the two 1e(-) potentials (DeltaDeltaE(disp) < 0). Nitrobenzene is treated with the same computational protocol to provide a system for comparison that is not complicated by the major structural change that influences the COT energy profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207