Effect of Gas Density on the Hydrodynamics of Bubble Columns and Three‐Phase Fluidized Beds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Experiments were performed at ambient temperature and pressure in a 127 mm inner diameter column with a 55% wt. aqueous glycerol solution, 6‐mm spherical borosilicate beads and four gases — helium, air, carbon dioxide and sulphur hexafluoride — giving a 35‐fold gas density range. The dispersed bubble flow regime was sustained to higher gas velocities and gas holdups for denser gases. This finding appears to be due to the reduction of the maximum stable bubble size (i.e. enhanced bubble break‐up), rather than to formation of smaller bubbles at the distributor with increasing gas density. The effect of gas density was significant both with and without the particles present, with gas holdup increasing, bed voidage increasing and liquid holdup decreasing with increasing gas density. The holdup correlations of Han et al. (1990) have been modified to incorporate the effect of gas density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".