MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035013105 · doi:10.1186/cc5569

Haemoglobin concentration influences the chloride–bicarbonate but not the strong ion difference–bicarbonate relationship

2007· article· en· W2035013105 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marco Mercieri, Azzurra Cesoni Marcelli, C Claroni, A. Mercieri

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal function and acid-base balance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBicarbonateMedicineChlorideAnion gapAcidosisInternal medicineChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chloride and bicarbonate concentrations share an inverse reciprocal relationship during either acidosis or alkalosis. This relationship is, in part, due to the red cell chloride shift. However, according to the Stewart quantitative approach to acid–base balance, it seems conceivable to expect a greater relationship between the strong ion difference (SID) and bicarbonate, rather then between chloride and bicarbonate. We propose that, with decreasing haemoglobin (Hb) levels, the SID preserves its independent role with respect to bicarbonate, while chloride gradually loses its relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicRenal function and acid-base balanceFrench-language works237,207