MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035035848 · doi:10.1117/12.929111

Role of the cathode interfacial layers in improving the stability of organic optoelectronic devices

2012· article· en· W2035035848 on OpenAlexaff
Qi Wang, Hany Aziz

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceOLEDOptoelectronicsElectroluminescenceLayer (electronics)CathodeElectroluminescent displayOrganic solar cellOrganic semiconductorMetalIrradiationRubreneDegradation (telecommunications)NanotechnologyComposite materialChemistryMetallurgyPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the photo-stability of various organic/metal contacts under monochromatic illumination. The results show that the organic/metal contacts are susceptible to irradiation, leading to deteriorations in both charge injection (i.e. from the metal to the organic layer) and charge extraction (i.e. from the organic layer to the metal). As a result, the photo-stability of these organic/metal contacts plays an important role in the stability of organic light-emitting devices (OLEDs), where the photo-degradation is caused by the irradiation of device own electroluminescence (EL), and organic photodetectors (OPDs), where exposure to light is obviously a more relevant issue. It is also found that interfacial layers such as cesium carbonate (Cs2CO3) and lithium acetylacetonate (Liacac) can greatly improve the photo-stability of the organic/metal contacts, and thus improve the stability of organic optoelectronic devices such as OLEDs and OPDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchFrench-language works237,207