MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035061388 · doi:10.1504/ijaacs.2014.058013

A local search heuristic to solve the planning problem of 3G UMTS all-IP release 4 networks with realistic traffic

2013· article· en· W2035061388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Autonomous and Adaptive Communications Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUMTS frequency bandsHeuristicLocal search (optimization)Mathematical optimizationIncremental heuristic searchNetwork planning and designSearch algorithmAlgorithmComputer networkBeam searchArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to develop an efficient heuristic in order to solve the planning problem of 3rd Generation (3G) UniversalMobile Telecommunication System (UMTS) all-IP Release 4 networks. Since the problem is NP-hard, an approximate algorithm based on the local search principle is proposed. Targeting a realistic planning tool, a realistic traffic profile was taken from real live networks. To evaluate the efficiency of the proposed heuristic, a comparative study in which the results are compared with respect to a reference model is conducted. Numerical analysis demonstrates that the local search algorithm produces solutions that are, on average, within 5.03% of the optimal solution, and in the best and worst cases at 0.87% and 9.29% of the optimal solution respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it