Social adjustment at school: Are children with cerebral palsy perceived more negatively by their peers than other at-risk children?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare three dimensions of social adjustment (social status, friendship and victimization) across four groups of children between the ages of nine and 12 who differ by their birth status (premature vs. at term) and the presence or absence of a motor impairment (with and without cerebral palsy [CP]). METHOD: All premature (n = 72) and term children (n = 118) without CP and all children with CP (premature with CP: n = 49; term with CP: n = 29) are part of a follow-up study. Social adjustment measures were obtained by conducting a classwide sociometric interview in the class of the target child. RESULTS: Irrespective of their birth status, girls with CP have more social adjustment problems than those without a disability. With respect to victimization, the results show that, irrespective of gender, both CP children and premature children (without CP) differ from their term peers (without CP). CONCLUSIONS: By comparing the four groups, we are able to qualify the impact of a visible clinical impairment such as CP versus that of extreme prematurity on social adjustment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".