À la croisée de La Côte de Sable et de King Edward : Ottawa, capitale littéraire de l’Ontario français ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le sillon des travaux de Pascale Casanova et de Raoul Boudreau sur les capitales littéraires, cet article s’interroge sur le rôle joué par Ottawa au sein de l’espace littéraire franco-ontarien. À plusieurs égards, Ottawa rappelle Moncton, capitale littéraire de l’Acadie aujourd’hui bien instituée. Cependant, malgré sa forte concentration de ressources littéraires et sa mise en récit dans des textes qui visent à lui rendre hommage, la capitale fédérale n’est pas parvenue à devenir une capitale littéraire pour l’Ontario français. L’étude des stratégies d’écriture employées par Daniel Poliquin dans La Côte de Sable et par Michel Ouellette dans King Edward pour mettre cette ville en scène permettra de cerner les limites du mythe ottavien, pourtant nécessaire à la transformation de la ville en capitale littéraire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".