MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035071193 · doi:10.1002/pola.23115

Toward low‐band gap dithienophosphole copolymers for an application in organic solar cells

2008· article· en· W2035071193 on OpenAlexaff
S. Durben, Debby Nickel, Robin Krüger, Todd C. Sutherland, Thomas Baumgartner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerFluoreneBand gapOrganic solar cellConjugated systemMaterials scienceSolar cellPolymer chemistryPolymerFullereneSolubilityPhotochemistryPolymer solar cellPolyfluoreneChemistryPhysical chemistryOptoelectronicsOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two functionalized dithieno[3,2‐ b :2′,3′‐ d ]phospholes with solubilizing groups have been synthesized that allow for the generation of a series of π‐conjugated AB‐ and ABC‐copolymers. The polymers obtained show notable optoelectronic properties with red‐shifted absorption and emission in the orange to red section of the optical solar spectrum. Although combination of dithienophosphole units with fluorene building blocks gives access to processable polymers with band gaps between 2.2 and 2.3 eV in solution and 2.0 eV in the solid state, an ABC copolymer based on dithienophosphole, fluorene, and bis(thienyl)benzothiadiazole units was found to not only exhibit a suitable band gap for solar cell applications (solution: 2.0 eV; solid state: 1.7 eV) but also showed good solubility as well as good electron transfer properties in the presence of fullerene (C 60 ). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 8179–8190, 2008

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207