Le rat est mort ! Ou le jeu de la tradition dans l’Hamlet de William Shakespeare (Notes de mise en scène)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article décrit le processus de création du spectacle Hamlet de William Shakespeare adapté et mis en scène par Cristina Iovita au Théâtre de l’Utopie (Montréal, mars-avril 2010). La première partie examine les rapports entre le personnage de Polonius et celui de Pantalon, personnage typique de la commedia dell’arte qui donne la « clé » de l’adaptation scénique. La deuxième partie présente la reconstruction du texte de Shakespeare sur les structures de base de la commedia dell’arte, structures identifiées et inspirées par la « scène des acteurs » (Acte II, Scène 2) du texte original. La troisième partie suit les innovations de style amenées par l’insertion dans la trame scénique du tango argentin, une danse narrative de type populaire exprimant les rites de la passion. La conclusion porte sur le potentiel d’actualisation du répertoire classique par la récupération des moyens scéniques traditionnels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".