Endothelium and myocyte cellular insulin receptor alterations in a rat model of myocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease is considered to be one of the leading causes of death in adults. While extensive research on mechanisms contributing to the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction (MI) has been underway, it is not known whether insulin receptor characteristics and postreceptor signaling have been fully addressed as yet. Present work attempts to investigate whether the remodeling process effectively induces alteration(s) in insulin-binding characteristics at the coronary endothelium and cardiomyocytes using a rat heart model of MI. MI was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Two animal groups were used in the study: (i) sham-operated CHAPS-untreated and CHAPS-treated, and (ii) MI CHAPS-untreated and MI CHAPS-treated. A physical model describing 1:1 stoichiometry of reversible insulin binding to its receptors present on the endothelium and at cardiomyocytes after CHAPS treatment was considered for data analysis. Quantitation of the collected effluents after heart perfusion, the inlet at the aortic and outlet at the coronary sinus sites, were curve fitted using a first-order Bessel function, which determines the binding constants (k(n)), the reversible constant (k(-n)), the dissociation constant (k(d) = k(-n)/k(n)), and the residency time constant (tau = 1/k(-n)). In addition, hearts were excised, separated into right and left ventricles, and individually weighed, and areas of infarcted regions were measured. Results of the MI group showed significant increases in relative heart mass, left ventricle mass, and right ventricle mass normalized to total body mass. MI induced severe ischemia and irreversible myocardial injury as assessed by planimetry and histologic studies. The data showed differences in insulin receptor affinities at the endothelial and cardiac myocytes in the sham and in the MI-operated rats. The observed reduction in the binding affinity of insulin at the myocyte postinfarction may explain the pathogenic role of insulin in ischemic heart disease and, hence, resistance. Therefore, insulin administration during and post MI might be cardioprotective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".