MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035105601 · doi:10.1159/000226247

The Innate Immune Response: An Important Partner in Shaping Coxsackievirus-Mediated Autoimmunity

2009· review· en· W2035105601 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Innate Immunity · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInnate immune systemAutoimmunityCoxsackievirusImmune systemImmunologyAcquired immune systemBiologyVirusEnterovirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To protect against viral infection, the immune response is critically dependent on innate sensing mechanisms to provide rapid detection of pathogens and allow for the development of an appropriate adaptive immune response. Mounting evidence suggests that mechanistic differences in the sensing of viruses by the innate immune response can contribute to the development of autoimmunity. Coxsackieviruses are common human pathogens that have been linked to the induction of autoimmune diseases such as chronic autoimmune myocarditis and type 1 diabetes. In this review, we will discuss the current knowledge of the interactions between coxsackievirus and the innate immune system and how these interactions can potentially lead to the induction of autoimmune diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it