MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035114699 · doi:10.4161/cc.10.10.15703

RB1 and p53 at the crossroad of EMT and triple-negative breast cancer

2011· review· en· W2035114699 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Jiang, Robert A. Jones, Jeff C. Liu, Tao Deng, Tyler Robinson, Philip E.D. Chung, Sharon Wang, Jason I. Herschkowitz, Sean E. Egan, Charles M. Perou, Eldad Zacksenhaus

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriple-negative breast cancerBreast cancerCancer researchBiologyProgenitor cellCancerEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionBasal (medicine)SuppressorProgenitorStem cellMetastasisGeneticsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease that includes Basal-like and Claudin-low tumors. The Claudin-low tumors are enriched for features associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and possibly for tumor initiating cells. Primary TNBCs respond relatively well to conventional chemotherapy; however, metastatic disease is virtually incurable. Thus, there is a great interest in identifying specific therapeutic targets for TNBC. The tumor suppressor RB1 is frequently lost in Basal-like breast cancer. To test for a causative role of RB1 gene loss in BC and for its effect on specific subtypes, we deleted mouse Rb in mammary stem/bipotent progenitor cells. This led to diverse mammary tumors including TNBC, with a subset of the latter containing p53 mutations and exhibiting features of Basal-like BC or EMT. Combined mutation of Rb and p53 in mammary stem/bipotent progenitors induced EMT type tumors. Here, we review our findings and those of others, which connect Rb and p53 to EMT in TNBC. Furthermore, we discuss how by understanding this circuit and its vulnerabilities, we may identify novel therapy for TNBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations139
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207