MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035128145 · doi:10.1177/1469540510376906

Uncertainty and the problem of value: Consumers, culture and inequality in urban China

2010· article· en· W2035128145 on OpenAlexaff
Amy Hanser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Consumer Culture · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographyChinaInequalitySociologyHierarchyValue (mathematics)DifferentiationUrban hierarchySocial classClass (philosophy)Consumer CultureEconomicsSocial scienceAdvertisingBusinessPolitical scienceEpistemologyMarket economyAnthropologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the divergent shopping patterns for consumers located in different positions within urban China’s social hierarchy. Drawing upon detailed ethnographic data, the article argues that differentiated class positions in urban China are expressed through the practicalities of daily shopping and consumer practices that involve fundamentally different ‘problems’ of uncertainty and value in the marketplace. It is shown that questions of social inequality are central to understanding not only marketplace behaviors, but also in drawing connections between markets and cultural logics of daily life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Consumer CultureSame topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207