MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035133856 · doi:10.1002/ejic.201200442

Pt<sup>II</sup> and Pd<sup>II</sup> Complexes with a <i>trans</i>‐Chelating Bis(pyridyl) Ligand

2012· article· en· W2035133856 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAxial and Atropisomeric Chirality Synthesis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryChelationLigand (biochemistry)BenzeneMedicinal chemistryPalladiumChlorobenzeneOxidative additionTolueneCatalysisCrystal structureStereochemistryCrystallographyInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An atropisomeric bis(pyridyl) chelate ligand bis{3,3′‐[N‐Ph‐2‐(2′‐py) indolyl]} (bpib) has been found to readily form trans ‐chelating Pd II and Pt II complexes. Two such complexes, Pt(bpib)Cl 2 and Pd(bpib)Cl 2 have been isolated and their structures were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Both Pt(bpib)Cl 2 and Pd(bpib)Cl 2 have a chiral structure with C 2 symmetry. Pt(bpib)Cl 2 displays a long‐lived phosphorescence with λ em = 595 nm in a frozen CH 2 Cl 2 solution at 77 K. To examine the potential use of the trans chelate bpib ligand in oxidative coupling reactions catalysed by Pd II compounds, acetoxylation of benzene, chlorobenzene and toluene by PhI(OAc) 2 using Pd(OAc) 2 /bpib (2:1) as the catalyst was examined and compared with the cis ‐chelating system Pd(OAc) 2 /2,2′‐bipyridine (bipy). The bpib system was found to accelerate the reaction but lower the overall yield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it