Le Documentaire intérieur. Travail du JE et mise en phase dans Lettres d’amour en Somalie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir de l’analyse de Lettres d’amour en Somalie de Frédéric Mitterrand (1981), cet article étudie le travail du JE dans ses différentes manifestations : JE autobiographique, JE historique et JE lyrique (ces deux notions sont empruntées à Käte Hamburger), JE privé, JE public, JE spectatoriel. Il s’attache notamment à mettre en évidence les effets de la construction en termes de JE dans la production d’une forme spécifique de documentaire que l’on peut appeler le documentaire intérieur (= un documentaire sur des réalités intérieures : les états d’âme de F. Mitterrand, les rêves de la Somalie), ainsi que dans la production de la « mise en phase » visant à faire partager aux spectateurs ces mêmes états d’âme. Au passage, deux problèmes théoriques sont revisités : celui du contrat autobiographique dans ses relations avec la documentarisation et la fictionnalisation et celui des niveaux de documentarisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".