MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035176329 · doi:10.1210/me.2004-0441

Estrogen Mediates Phosphorylation of Histone H3 in Ovarian Follicle and Mammary Epithelial Tumor Cells via the Mitotic Kinase, Aurora B

2005· article· en· W2035176329 on OpenAlexaff
Zulma Tatiana Ruiz-Cortés, Sarah Kimmins, Lucia Monaco, Kathleen H. Burns, Paolo Sassone‐Corsi, Bruce D. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Endocrinology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMitosisHistone H3EstrogenCell biologyInternal medicineAurora B kinaseHistoneEndocrinologyPhosphorylationOvarian follicleCancer researchFollicular phaseCellCell divisionSpindle apparatusBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cells of the ovarian follicle undergo extensive proliferation and differentiation from the time that the follicle escapes from the primordial state to its acquisition of ovulatory capacity. We examined the dynamic modification of the phosphorylation state of the histone H3 N-terminal tail in granulosa cells during follicular development. In rodent follicles, the granulosa cell H3 phosphorylation on Ser10 peaks during proestrus. This epigenetic mark is induced by both FSH and 17beta-estradiol (E2), acting independently. E2-induced H3 phosphorylation fails to occur in mice with inactivated alpha-isoform of the nuclear estrogen receptor. E2 induction of histone phosphorylation is attenuated by cell cycle inhibition. Further, E2 induces the activity of the mitotic kinase, Aurora B, in a mammary tumor cell model where mitosis is estrogen receptor-alpha dependent. These results provide evidence for mitotic regulation in follicle development by estrogen and demonstrate a previously undiscovered mechanism for induction of cell proliferation in ovarian and mammary gland cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular EndocrinologySame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207