MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035201919 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602603

The capacitated team orienteering and profitable tour problems

2008· article· en· W2035201919 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia Archetti, Dominique Feillet, Alain Hertz, M. Grazia Speranza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Operational Research Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrienteeringComputer scienceOperations researchHeuristicHeuristicsProject managementMatching (statistics)The InternetPurchasingOperations managementMathematical optimizationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the capacitated team orienteering and profitable tour problems (CTOP and CPTP). The interest in these problems comes from recent developments in the use of the Internet for a better matching of demand and offer of transportation services. We propose exact and heuristic procedures for the CTOP and the CPTP. The computational results show that the heuristic procedures often find the optimal solution and in general cause very limited errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations162
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Operational Research SocietySame topicVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsFrench-language works237,207