MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035233294 · doi:10.1177/0265407512448266

I don’t want to get involved: Shyness, psychological control, and youth activities

2012· article· en· W2035233294 on OpenAlex
Scott R. Miller

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Social and Personal Relationships · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Development and Social Support
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShynessPsychologyPsychological controlDevelopmental psychologyAutonomyContext (archaeology)TemperamentClinical psychologySocial psychologyAnxietyPersonalityPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although activity involvement has been associated with youths’ social adjustment, shy youth may be hesitant to get involved due to fear of negative evaluation, especially in the context of parents’ psychologically controlling behaviors. The present study assessed youths’ shyness and parents’ psychological control as predictors of youth activity involvement in a grade five Canadian sample ( N = 153). Females and youth reporting high parental control reported less sports involvement. Shyness especially attenuated boys’ sports involvement. Being male and parental control predicted less music involvement. Shy youth reporting high parental control were less involved in music and fewer types of activities. Results suggest the importance of parental autonomy-granting to encourage greater activity participation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it