MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2035244633 · doi:10.1029/2008gl033565

Influence of the enhanced mixing within the Southern Ocean fronts on the overturning circulation

2008· article· en· W2035244633 on OpenAlexafffund
Oleg A. Saenko

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsUpwellingGeologyAbyssal zoneOceanographyAntarctic Bottom WaterMixing (physics)ClimatologyCircumpolar deep waterThermohaline circulationShutdown of thermohaline circulationLead (geology)Ocean currentNorth Atlantic Deep WaterWater columnCurrent (fluid)Geomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observations indicate that turbulent mixing is enhanced in the major fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), penetrating through much of the water column. Here we employ a simple representation of this process in a global climate model to evaluate its potential impact on the ocean's overturning circulation. Two effects are obtained. First, the frontally‐intensified mixing in the Southern Ocean increases the transformation of NADW to UCDW. Second, by intensifying the dense water upwelling in the south, the vertical mixing in the ACC fronts returns a fraction of the northward flowing AABW/LCDW as UCDW, consistent with recent observational results; the corresponding abyssal overturning weakens. The results are interpreted using a single‐basin model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→